• Member Login


    Not registered yet?
    Click Here to sign-up

    Forgot Your Login?
    Upcoming Events
    Closed in Observation of Juneteenth
    Jun 19, 2024
    Teamsters Local #252
    General Membership Meeting
    Jun 24, 2024
    Teamsters Local #252
    Closed in Observation of Independence Day
    Jul 04, 2024
    Teamsters Local #252
    Closed in Observation of Labor Day
    Sep 02, 2024
    Teamsters Local #252
    General Membership Meeting
    Sep 23, 2024
    Teamsters Local #252
    Teamster News Headlines
    Maryland Archeologists Join Teamsters
    Teamsters Celebrate Pride Month
    Tops Markets Teamsters Ratify New Contract
    Cambridge Becomes Second Mass. City to Stand with Teamsters in Combatting Worker Misclassification
    Teamsters-Backed Warehouse Protection Bill Approved by N.Y. Legislature
    Workers at Glenstone Museum Vote to Join Teamsters
    New Jersey Teamsters Advance Pro-Worker Public Policy
    Workers at Clean Harbors Vote Overwhelmingly to Join Teamsters
    Workers at Airgas Vote Overwhelmingly to Join Teamsters
    Teamsters to Amazon: Stop Ducking Congress
      IBT UnionActive Newswire  
    Updated: Jun. 15 (21:14)
    The Best Way to Secure LGBTQ Rights: Unions
    Teamsters Local 355
    Teamsters Local 90
    Teamsters Local 90
    The Best Way to Secure LGBTQ Rights: Unions
    Teamsters Local 992
    Supreme Court backs Starbucks Over Fired Pro-Union Workers
    Teamsters Local 355
    Supreme Court backs Starbucks Over Fired Pro-Union Workers
    Teamsters Local 992
  • Employee Rights

    Know Your Rights

    In addition to your rights outlined in your collective bargaining agreement. All Union members have inherent legal rights. It is important that you know which rights apply to you. Some of these rights apply to all Union Members, while others apply only to public employees. This page contains an overview of three of your basic legal rights as they apply to disciplinary situations.

    Weingarten Rights - The Right to Representation

    Union members are entitled to be accompanied by a Union representative during investigatory interviews.  In the NLRB vs. Weingarten, 420 US 251 (1975) case, the U.S. Supreme Court held that, upon request, employees represented by a union have a right to the presence of union representative during “investigatory interviews” conducted by the employer. The rights established in that case are commonly known as “Weingarten” rights.

    What is an Investigatory Interview?

    An investigatory interview occurs when a supervisor questions an employee to obtain information which could be used as a basis for discipline or asks an employee to defend his or her conduct. The test is whether an employee has a “reasonable belief” that discipline could result from what he or she says during the interview. If so, the employee has a right to be accompanied by a union representative.

    Weingarten Rules and Employee Rights

    The employee must make a clear request for union representation. Unlike the Miranda warnings which police must give before making an arrest, an employer does not have to inform the employee of their right to make this request.

    Once the employee requests union representation, the employer has three options:

    Grant the request and delay questioning until the union representative arrives and has a chance to consult privately with the employee; or

    Deny the request and end the interview immediately; or

    Give the employee the choice of (i) having the interview without representation, or (ii) ending the interview.

    If the employer denies an employee’s request for representation, the employee may refuse to answer any questions. Continuing to ask questions after denying representation is an unfair labor practice under the Public Employment Relations Commission and National Labor Relations Act.

    Rights of Union Representative or Shop Steward

    When the union representative or steward arrives, the supervisor must inform the union representative or steward what the interview is about.

    The union representative or steward must be allowed to speak privately with employee before the interview begins.

    The union representative or steward has the right to speak during the interview. However, the union representative or steward does not have the right to bargain over the purpose of the interview or to obstruct the interview.

    When the interview ends, the union representative or steward can provide additional information to the supervisor such as extenuating or mitigating circumstances.

    Garrity Rights - Public Employees

    GARRITY: The Fifth Amendment applies to interrogations of public employees.

    Public employees have certain constitutional rights that apply in their employment that may not apply to private employees. For example, in Garrity v New Jersey, 385 U.S. 493 (1967) the Supreme Court held that statements obtained in the course of an investigatory interview under the threat of termination from public employment cannot be used as evidence against the employee in subsequent criminal proceedings. If, however, you refuse to answer questions after you have been assured that your statements cannot be used against you in a subsequent criminal proceeding, the refusal to answer questions thereafter may lead to the imposition of discipline for insubordination. Further, while the statements you make may not be used against you in a subsequent criminal proceeding, they can still form the basis for discipline on the underlying work related charge.

    To ensure that your Garrity rights are protected you should ask the following questions:

    If I refuse to talk, can I be disciplined for the refusal?

    Can that discipline include termination from employment?

    Are my answers for internal and administrative purposes only and not to be used for criminal prosecution?

    If you are asked to provide a written statement regarding the subject of the interview, the following statement should be included in your report:

    “It is my understanding that this report is made for internal administrative purpose only. This report is made by me after being ordered to do so by my supervisor. It is my understanding that refusing to provide this report could result in my being disciplined for insubordination up to and including termination of employment. This report is made pursuant to that order and the potential discipline that could result for failing to provide this report.”

    Loudermill Rights - Public Employees

    LOUDERMILL: Most public employees have a constitutional right to a pre-termination “hearing.”

    In another decision announcing a Constitutional right for public employees not possessed by private employees, the Supreme Court in Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 US 532 Ed 2d 494, (1985) held that most public employees are entitled to a hearing before they are discharged. However, the “hearing” is not a full evidentiary hearing and need not include the opportunity to cross examine your accusers.

    All that is required is:

    Oral or written notice of the charges and time for hearing; and

    An explanation of the employer’s evidence; and

    An opportunity to present “his or her side of the story.”

    Further, since the issuance of the Loudermill decision, the lower courts have strictly limited the remedy for Loudermill violations. Specifically, an employee deprived of his Loudermill rights in not entitled to reinstatement if the employer can prove that there was just cause for the discharge in any case.

    Page Last Updated: Apr 04, 2022 (15:00:47)
  • Teamsters Union Local 252

    Copyright © 2024.
    All Rights Reserved.

    Powered By UnionActive

    78597 hits since Mar 25, 2022

  • Top of Page image